The blog explains that even when e-invoices pass technical validation, tax authorities may reject them due to jurisdiction‑specific enrichment requirements. It outlines nine enrichment types—formatting, sequencing, tax calculation, address, digital signatures, regulatory compliance, classification, completeness, and content sanitization—across multiple countries. Common pitfalls highlighted include missing VAT exemption text, improper rounding, and lack of cryptographic proofs.
Portugal requires tax numbers without country code prefixes; including prefixes can lead to rejection.
Argentina requires amounts to be rounded to exactly two decimal places using banker’s rounding; amounts with more decimals may be rejected.
Saudi Arabia requires a cryptographic hash for integrity verification and a QR code containing encrypted transaction data on each e‑invoice.
These countries require tax numbers to be presented without country code prefixes, contrary to the standard format that includes them.
PEPPOL networks require rounding adjustments to be calculated and included separately on the invoice; omission can cause rejection.
Get VAT and indirect tax news delivered to your inbox twice a week.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
LinkedIn · about 24 hours ago
The post discusses how SAP's VAT logic can fail due to governance and design issues rather than system bugs. It highlights that VAT determination often appears to work but may still be incorrect, and that KGT’s in‑SAP VAT data analysis uncovers these problems.
LinkedIn Article by James Dodd · 4 days ago
Multi‑country e‑invoicing is evolving from a compliance exercise into a global business transformation initiative. The article outlines four strategic pillars—selecting a single global supplier, partnering with a tax‑technology expert, ensuring clean ERP‑driven data, and leveraging automation—to turn compliance into operational value. These elements can help multinational organisations reduce complexity, improve accuracy, and unlock broader financial insights.
e-Invoice.app · 13 days ago
The article outlines five marketing shifts reshaping e‑invoicing vendor strategies in 2026, highlighting the importance of compliance thought leadership, real‑time compliance intelligence, and digital discovery tools. It provides market growth projections and the increasing need for structured, cross‑functional reference data.
VATCalc · 14 days ago
The article discusses how AI is now being integrated into VAT tax engines, emphasizing that the real benefit comes from smarter workflow design rather than just smarter models. It highlights reliability as the key constraint and advocates a human‑in‑the‑loop operating model to ensure accurate, auditable VAT determinations. It also outlines near‑term applications such as faster coding, ERP reconciliation, anomaly flagging, and regulatory change monitoring.
Fonoa · 23 days ago
The blog explains how embedding tax automation into marketplace platforms can unlock revenue, reduce risk, and support compliance across multiple jurisdictions. It outlines platform reporting obligations in the EU (DAC7), UK, Mexico, Canada, Australia, and other countries, and highlights the benefits of integrated tax services for sellers and platform operators.
LinkedIn Article by Erik van der Hoeven · 25 days ago
The article explains how indirect tax compliance has evolved from a SaaS-like model to an infrastructure layer, driven by regulatory changes such as e‑invoicing mandates that embed compliance into transactional workflows. It highlights the shift toward networked operating layers, with platforms focusing on connectivity, interoperability, and real‑time regulatory interaction rather than just calculation and filing. The piece notes that regulatory velocity and mandate rollouts are now key drivers of platform selection and market dynamics.
