VATfaqs.com
NewsVAT ValidatorSubmit ArticleAbout

Our Sponsors

e-Invoice.app logo

VATfaqs.com

Global VAT and indirect tax news for professionals.

Links

  • Digest Archive
  • About
  • Submit Article

Tools

  • VAT Number Validator

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

© 2026 VATfaqs.com - Global VAT News

    Back to News
    LinkedIn
    January 8, 2026 (about 2 months ago)

    One interesting aspect about VAT is that the same arguments can often operate both for and against taxpayers, depending on the specific circumstances in the case.

    Featured image for: One interesting aspect about VAT is that the same arguments can often operate both for and against taxpayers, depending on the specific circumstances in the case.
    United Kingdom VAT News • LinkedIn

    Summary

    Fabian Barth examines how HMRC’s positions on input tax deduction have varied across cases, citing Royal Opera House, Hotel La Tour, and Littlewoods. He highlights contradictory stances on LVCR trade in the Channel Islands, underscoring the complexity of VAT compliance. The post emphasizes that court rulings and precedent shape the practical application of VAT rules.

    e-Invoice.app - Global e-Invoicing Requirements Tracker
    Gold Sponsor

    e-Invoice.app

    Global e-Invoicing Requirements Tracker

    Stay Updated on VAT News

    Get VAT and indirect tax news delivered to your inbox twice a week.

    No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

    Related News

    Completing an Import One Stop Shop VAT return as an intermediary on behalf of your client

    UK Government · 5 days ago

    HMRC’s guidance explains that intermediaries can register for the Import One‑Stop Shop (IOSS) scheme from 1 April 2026 and must submit a monthly IOSS VAT return on behalf of each client. The return must capture VAT on low‑value imports to EU and Northern Ireland consumers, use ECB exchange rates, and requires nil returns if no sales occur. Intermediaries must also keep 10‑year records and can correct returns within three years.

    UK Court Blocks Telecom's £51M VAT Refund Bid

    Law360 · 7 days ago

    A London appeals court dismissed a UK telecommunications provider’s bid to recover £51.1 million in VAT payments, agreeing with a lower court that the VAT is owed when the provider supplied services. The decision confirms the provider cannot recover the VAT paid on its telecom services.

    Lycamobile UK Loses Appeal in £50 Million Tax Case

    Bloomberg Tax · 7 days ago

    The Upper Tribunal ruled that Lycamobile UK must pay more than £50 million in VAT, requiring the operator to charge VAT on the full price of prepaid mobile bundles at the point of sale, rather than only on services actually used. The decision, dated 12 Feb 2026, overturns Lycamobile's previous VAT calculation method.

    VAT Government and Public Bodies

    UK Government · 8 days ago

    This HMRC internal manual provides guidance on how VAT applies to local authorities and other government and public bodies in the UK. It covers various categories such as non‑business activities, police authorities, NHS capital projects, and local government partnership programmes. The manual serves as a reference for VAT compliance and exemptions for public sector entities.

    UK E-invoicing Mandate 2029: Prepare Finance & IT Now

    Seeburger · 12 days ago

    The UK will require all VAT invoices to be e‑invoiced by 2029, mandating machine‑readable formats and accredited transmission. The article outlines the scope, Peppol alignment, and a step‑by‑step timeline for 2026‑2028 to help finance, IT and procurement prepare. It highlights key milestones such as selecting an access point, adopting a canonical data model, and piloting with trading partners.

    One minute with Fabian Barth

    TaxJournal · 12 days ago

    The interview with Fabian Barth, VAT Manager at Alvarez & Marsal, discusses the challenges of obtaining binding rulings in the UK, recent Supreme Court VAT cases in 2025, and his view that legislative changes should allow public law arguments in tribunals. He notes that the Hotel La Tour and Prudential cases downplayed CJEU precedent, and that European case law remains binding but is not always applied.

    Key Facts

    • •HMRC’s position in the Royal Opera House and Hotel La Tour cases held that input tax deduction is governed by direct consumption rather than overarching economics.
    • •In the Littlewoods case, HMRC adopted the opposite stance, leading the tribunal to rule in favour of the appellant, a decision deemed sensible given precedent.
    • •HMRC’s contradictory arguments on LVCR trade in the Channel Islands: in 2006 it argued removal of LVCR from Channel Island mail‑order goods was not permitted, while in 2012 it contended removal of LVCR from Channel Island mail‑order exports to the UK was likewise disallowed.
    • •The post underscores that court rulings and precedent are critical in determining the practical application of VAT rules.
    Europe
    United Kingdom
    Compliance
    Cross-Border
    Read Full Article at LinkedIn